History of Video Blogging
February 14th, 2008 Richard Posted in personal media, vlog, web and new media | 6 Comments »
In May of 2005 I was searching for shows/movies/videos made by independent producers on the web. I figured there had to be something interesting out there, and it took a surprisingly long time to find anything. (This was long before youtube – 9 months – 100 web years ). Finally, I stumbled upon a community that called themselves video bloggers. They had even hosted a conference called Vloggercon near the beginning of 2005. Videos of every talk were on line and I watched them all. Although my goal was just to find something interesting to watch, I quickly got drawn into the interactive nature of the community, which was at it’s core. I used a wonderful site, created by Ryanne Hodson and Michael Verdi, called freevlog, and I was strangely compelled to create silly videos of my own. I found out quickly that this community was different from anything I had experienced before. I sent an email to a freevlog help address and ended up exchanging a number of emails with Ryanne’s partner (and sort of the father of video blogging to me) Jay Dedman, who seemed very motivated to help me video blog. Although Jay was a “big wig” in the vlog community to me, this was clearly different than what I was used to. “Stars” smile and sign autographs and say nice stuff, but the idea of all the existing video bloggers at the time was to help everyone to be a “star”, which is why the word “star” is in quotes, because, of course, there were no stars here, but people communicating in new and interesting ways. When you’re a “star” you need an audience to watch you. When you’re a member of a community, you want other members like yourself to participate. This is the best of the web experience to me – community, support, and rich media distributed widely.
So I made a video blog, called it the Richard Show, posted a short video of a racoon eating from a birdfeeder, called it “ozarks birdfeeder“, and posted it. Within a day, several people, including Steve Garfield, who was – in many way – the first video blogger, commented on the video. On my second video, Amanda Congdon, the original host of Rocketboom – clearly an internet celebrity – commented, and, eventually became good friends with my wife and me. For my part, I was following many of the vloggers who were following me, commenting, and participating actively in the vlog group list. I haven’t slowed down too much since.
I presented a “creative research presentation” at the Association for Internet Researchers meeting this October in the form of a 15 minute video on the (my) history of video blogging, that sort of sums up my experience, and my take on this phenomenon so far.
February 15th, 2008 at 2:27 pm
It’s hard to know what to say here except, yum, beef jerky….
I don’t relate so strongly to video myself, and don’t know what I’d do if I tried to video blog, but that’s just me; I’ve always been a text-person rather than a voice-person and am just starting to develop that voice side of myself more.
But what I am thinking about more generally is whether the growth of the web has encouraged more verdant communities because of the broader geographic access it enables? I wonder this because I keep ending up around various geek subcultures and I think, are people younger than myself more likely to be able to join these subcultures because they can find them at an earlier age?
February 15th, 2008 at 6:19 pm
I think video just adds another form of communication to the buffet table. I remember trying to text blog for about 2 years. I’d start a blog, write a little, and then “fail”.
But since I’m a visual person, videoblogging lets me record little moments in my day that I dont need to translate to text. I can just show you.
Here’s a god example of one: http://www.momentshowing.net/2008/01/video-a-story-t.html
Ultimately, there is no “best” form of communication. I love to read since text is great at describing complex ideas. Sound and music is great at creating feeling. Video is good for making things real, as if you’ve experienced it.
February 17th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
The ‘richness’ that video brings along is what interests me. I’m a visual kind of a person myself. Even though I became aware of the vlogging phenomenon after youtube started, the prospect of vlogging captured my imagination the moment I found out about it. I was sick and tired of reading the tutorials on how to create certain effects on photoshop and flash and it was one of the first things that I searched in the youtube. The things I wanted to do in those applications were all of a sudden………achievable. Its fun to watch people do their everyday stuff and be able to comment to the actual people in the video. With the capabilities offered via the web, the rich form of knowledge sharing is now a reality.
It’s true that there is no best form of communication. The comments from Michelle and Mr. Dedman reminded me of Channel Expansion Theory. Channel Expansion Theory accounts for experiential factors that influence the perceived richness of a particular channel of communication i.e. experiential knowledge can have positive influence on perceived media richness.
The history of videoblogging video was really captivating. I remember commenting about it when Dr. Hall first posted it. This type of video is a real treat to watch as one can clearly see the creativity of the creator and the quality of the video. That is what I like about people like Mr. Dedman, Mr. Garfield, Mr. Verdi and the rest of the pioneering vloggers…….vloggers with a cause.
February 17th, 2008 at 9:00 pm
Hi, Jay! It’s been a while!
February 17th, 2008 at 9:03 pm
And you’re absolutely right about having multiple options available. I know one of the things I do love video for is watching musical performances… fingers on instruments, mouths forming words… all creating sound… magical. Can’t do that with text.
February 18th, 2008 at 11:49 pm
I’ve seen another side of Richard. The polar plunge was definitely entertaining; as well as watching your wife and you interact. I could get my sound to work for some reason but the images were still interesting.